🔗 Share this article

When I am a DM, I historically steered clear of significant use of randomization during my D&D sessions. I preferred was for narrative flow and session development to be shaped by deliberate decisions as opposed to the roll of a die. However, I decided to alter my method, and I'm incredibly pleased with the outcome.

The Spark: Seeing a Custom Mechanic

A well-known actual-play show features a DM who frequently requests "chance rolls" from the players. This involves picking a polyhedral and defining potential outcomes based on the number. This is essentially no unlike consulting a pre-generated chart, these are devised in the moment when a character's decision lacks a predetermined outcome.

I chose to experiment with this approach at my own game, mainly because it looked novel and provided a break from my normal practice. The results were fantastic, prompting me to reflect on the perennial tension between pre-determination and randomization in a roleplaying game.

A Memorable Session Moment

During one session, my party had just emerged from a massive fight. When the dust settled, a player wondered if two key NPCs—a sibling duo—had lived. Rather than choosing an outcome, I handed it over to chance. I asked the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: a low roll, both would perish; a middling roll, only one would die; on a 10+, they made it.

The player rolled a 4. This resulted in a deeply poignant scene where the party found the bodies of their allies, still clasped together in death. The party performed last rites, which was uniquely powerful due to earlier roleplaying. As a parting reward, I chose that the forms were suddenly transformed, revealing a enchanted item. I randomized, the bead's magical effect was precisely what the group needed to resolve another major quest obstacle. It's impossible to script this type of perfect moments.

Honing On-the-Spot Skills

This incident caused me to question if randomization and spontaneity are in fact the beating heart of tabletop RPGs. While you are a prep-heavy DM, your ability to adapt need exercise. Groups reliably excel at derailing the most carefully laid narratives. Therefore, a skilled DM needs to be able to think quickly and fabricate details in the moment.

Using similar mechanics is a excellent way to train these talents without venturing too far outside your preparation. The trick is to apply them for small-scale situations that don't fundamentally change the overarching story. To illustrate, I wouldn't use it to determine if the main villain is a secret enemy. Instead, I might use it to figure out whether the PCs reach a location just in time to see a key action unfolds.

Strengthening Shared Narrative

Luck rolls also works to keep players engaged and foster the sensation that the story is responsive, progressing based on their choices as they play. It prevents the sense that they are merely pawns in a rigidly planned narrative, thereby strengthening the shared nature of roleplaying.

This philosophy has long been part of the original design. Early editions were filled with charts, which fit a playstyle focused on dungeon crawling. Even though contemporary D&D frequently prioritizes story and character, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, it's not necessarily the required method.

Finding the Right Balance

There is absolutely no problem with being prepared. However, there is also no issue with stepping back and permitting the whim of chance to determine certain outcomes rather than you. Authority is a major part of a DM's responsibilities. We need it to manage the world, yet we often struggle to give some up, in situations where doing so might improve the game.

The core recommendation is this: Don't be afraid of letting go of control. Embrace a little chance for minor story elements. You might just create that the organic story beat is infinitely more rewarding than anything you could have pre-written on your own.